Galanda, Chris Fucile, Christopher McCrory, Cole Fawcett, Edrien Photographers featured include Agustin Farias, Anais Lalitte, Celeste There is another added element to capture that in One question everyĭesigner asks themselves is “where will they wear my clothes?” Danceĭoesn’t let a single angle of the garment hide and vulnerabilities canīe exposed. There is a symbiotic relationshipīetween the two art forms with every spin and kick. DancingĪllows clothes to take on a new life. Restrictions? Dance and fashion are naturally intertwined. With Netflix star Spanish actor Omar Ayuso from Elite gracing one of two covers captured by Jesús Leonardo.įrom a fashion perspective, movement is always used to describeĬlothes, but can you really move, where are the limitations and Sernin and Saul Nash, DJ and dancer Kiddy Smile, B-boy, and multimediaĪrtist Frankie Perez, the duo behind iconic parties LA CREOLE, along
![nude gay men tumbllr nude gay men tumbllr](https://66.media.tumblr.com/d151eff9b254e748d39ce2047549c8cd/tumblr_pie35anR7Q1qffjjp_540.jpg)
We want to release into the world with this issue.Ĭreative freedom and immaculate craftsmanship are something that isįound in all of our dialogues. Dance also carries immense freedom even when there’s pain.ĭance elicits an emotional response whether it’s anxiety or love, that Happiest place at the moment from war to climate change to social Our 20th issue also marks our 10th Anniversary! It was clear from theīeginning that it was something to celebrate and nothing makes us feel And that’s all you need to know about his copyright bill.Fucking Young! #20 – DANCE – Omar Ayuso (Cover ½) Hawley isn’t even trying, because he simply does not care. Legislators have long pushed bills that they knew weren’t going to go anywhere, but the level of effort involved has plummeted. All because Disney is the latest punching bag for a Republican party whose rabid homophobia would not look out of place in 1909. It is regression as a meme, a fart in the wind, an empty and cynical gesture meant for a future fundraising email. This is not a radical rethinking of copyright. What, does he want us to go back to shitting in buckets, too? Would I like to see copyright terms reduced? Absolutely! Would I like to see our representatives challenge mega-corporations? Of course! Would I appreciate legislators taking big swings to push the Overton window on tech policy? Hell yes!īut Hawley is cribbing his copyright policy from 1909. But nothing about this bill is intended to provoke thoughtful discussion, let alone pass Congress.
![nude gay men tumbllr nude gay men tumbllr](https://64.media.tumblr.com/054be05b31689fb6d1cd019c9cdb4ade/tumblr_nzosao3Q1L1r00vg7o3_500.gif)
I say this as someone who thinks copyright law is too restrictive, that copyright terms are too long, that the last extension of copyright terms should have never been allowed in 1998, and that Disney’s activism toward that end is reprehensible. A reduction of copyright terms to 28 years is also barred by international law. The requirement for an application for an extension is, similarly, an outdated legal formality that was abandoned by the Copyright Act of 1973, barred from future law when the United States signed onto the international copyright treaty known as the Berne Convention in 1988, and further precluded by a succession of trade agreements (for example, NAFTA in 1994, KORUS in 2007). The 28-year copyright term is a throwback to the Copyright Act of 1909. The 28-year term would apply retroactively to Disney, stripping it of intellectual property assets going back to Steamboat Willie. Except, that is, for the copyrights owned by the Walt Disney Company (aka the person in the room with a market capitalization of more than $150 billion). The bill would set copyright terms to 28 years (plus a potential renewal of another 28 years) for all works going forward.
#NUDE GAY MEN TUMBLLR CODE#
In brief, the bill is targeted at the Walt Disney Company, also known as,Ī person that (i) has a market capitalization of more than $150,000,000,000 and (ii)(I) is classified under North American Industry Classification System code 5121 or 71 or (II) engages in substantial activities for which a code described in subclause (I) could be assigned. It is knowingly in violation of the Constitution, and an insult to the democratic process. There is not a line in it that is meant to pass muster. Normally, I love talking about copyright! I’ll talk about copyright all day long! But writing this post is agony, because the thought of giving this absolutely asinine piece of legislation any attention is killing me on the inside. I have been told to blog about Senator Josh Hawley’s new copyright bill, and I do this with nothing but the greatest reluctance.